George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz

50 A.D.2d 688, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz. Read the opinion of the Court — 49 A.D.2d 58

Opinion

— Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. The facts found by Special Term have been considered and affirmed. Pursuant tó CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did Special Term err as a matter of law in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the cause of action set forth in the complaint on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction of the person of the defendant?” Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz, 50 A.D.2d 688, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 688 (George Reiner & Co. v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.