George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. Surratt

48 S.W. 1118, 2 Indian Terr. 203, 1899 Indian Terr. LEXIS 84
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory·Decided January 14, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Springer, C. J.

The facts in this case are in legal effect the same as in the case of Same appellant vs Adams, 2 Ind. Ter. 119. The opinion of the court in that case is the opinion of the court in the case at bar. The number of cattle replevined in this case was .5; the- amount claimed as due appellee in his answer was it '06; and the judgment of the court was for $750. In othi respects the facts and action of the court were the same a, n case No. 166. The judgment of the court below is reversed, and a new trial is awarded in accordance with the opinion in the case of Commission Co. vs Adams, 2 Ind. Ter. 119. Reversed and jRe-manded. ■

Townsend, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. Surratt, 48 S.W. 1118, 2 Indian Terr. 203, 1899 Indian Terr. LEXIS 84 (Conn. 1899).

48 S.W. 1118 (George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. Surratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Bradshaw
159 S.W. 259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)