George Paul Laroque v. Carl F. Troy, American Consul to Australia (Sydney, N.S.W., Australia)
This text of 838 F.2d 466 (George Paul Laroque v. Carl F. Troy, American Consul to Australia (Sydney, N.S.W., Australia)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
838 F.2d 466
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Paul LAROQUE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carl F. TROY, American Consul to Australia (Sydney, N.S.W.,
Australia), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-7333.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Nov. 23, 1987.
George Paul Laroque, pro se.
Before SPROUSE, ERVIN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George Laroque seeks to appeal from the district court order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee of $89.81. As the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 F.2d 466, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15342, 1987 WL 35059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-paul-laroque-v-carl-f-troy-american-consul-to-australia-sydney-ca4-1987.