George Paul Cook v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

402 F.2d 294
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 28, 1968·No. 25926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant-petitioner, a Florida state prisoner released on a conditional pardon under supervision for life, sought habeas corpus relief on the grounds that the state suppressed evidence on his trial material to his defense and also knowingly used perjured testimony. The district court, after a comprehensive evidentiary hearing, concluded that petitioner’s proof fell short of the mark and denied relief.

The burden was on petitioner to establish his allegations by a preponderance of the evidence. Walker v. Johnston, 1941, 312 U.S. 275, 286, 61 S.Ct. 574, 85 L.Ed. 830; Williams v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 354 F.2d 698, 704. Based on an examination of the evidence, we are of the firm view that the district court was correct. The relief was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Paul Cook v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 402 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1968).

402 F.2d 294 (George Paul Cook v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alex Reizenstein v. Maurice Sigler
428 F.2d 702 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
Conyers v. Wainwright
309 F. Supp. 1101 (S.D. Florida, 1970)