George Park v. United States
This text of 296 F.2d 123 (George Park v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this narcotics ease, objection is made to the sufficiency of the evidence even though no motion was made for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence. We find the objection is really an argument relating to the credibility of witnesses. Some instructions were offered by defendant and rejected. No exception was taken to the instructions, either given or refused. We find no plain error on the first two points.
The third proposition of constitutionality was determined adversely to Park in Caudillo v. United States, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 513.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 F.2d 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-park-v-united-states-ca9-1962.