George Papuchis v. Honorable John A. Bresnahan, Referee in Bankruptcy

393 F.2d 359, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 250, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7901
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 1, 1968·No. 21211_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, creditors and stockholders of the J & P Distributors, Inc., contend that the Referee in Bankruptcy and the District Court incorrectly denied their motion to intervene in opposition to the bankruptcy proceedings against the above-named corporation. We think appellants have no right to intervene as creditors opposing the petition in bankruptcy. See In re Carden, 118 F.2d 677, 679 (2d Cir.), cert. denied McClave & Co. v. Carden, 314 U.S. 647, 62 S.Ct. 91, 86 L.Ed. 519 (1941). They might have a right to intervene as stockholders if there were substantial grounds .to believe that the J & P Corporation would not adequately contest the bankrupcty proceedings. See Klein v. Nu-Way Shoe Co., 136 F.2d 986, 989 (2d Cir. 1943). But since appellants’ motion to intervene made no such allegation against the corporation, we do not face that issue. Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Papuchis v. Honorable John A. Bresnahan, Referee in Bankruptcy, 393 F.2d 359, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 250, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7901 (D.C. Cir. 1968).

393 F.2d 359 (George Papuchis v. Honorable John A. Bresnahan, Referee in Bankruptcy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klein v. Nu-Way Shoe Co.
136 F.2d 986 (Second Circuit, 1943)
In Re Carden
118 F.2d 677 (Second Circuit, 1941)
Hunteman v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
314 U.S. 647 (Supreme Court, 1941)