George N. Mas and Frank M. Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company

222 F.2d 889, 105 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 462, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 5430
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 2, 1955·No. 11466·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for the infringement of a design patent for a beverage bottle, Des. 102,569, issued December 29, 1936. The district court held that the patent was limited to frosted surface ornamentation as shown by the patent drawing and did not include the form or configuration of the bottle. Since the defendant makes only bottles devoid of surface ornamentation the district court concluded that it had not infringed the patent and entered a summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We have carefully examined- the record and are entirely satisfied that the conclusions of the district court were correct for the reasons well stated in the opinion filed by Judge Meaney. 122 F.Supp. 582.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George N. Mas and Frank M. Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company, 222 F.2d 889, 105 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 462, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 5430 (3d Cir. 1955).

222 F.2d 889 (George N. Mas and Frank M. Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Tatnall Measuring Systems Co.
169 F. Supp. 1 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1958)
Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.
167 F. Supp. 657 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1958)
Glatt v. Sisco
136 F. Supp. 936 (D. New Jersey, 1956)