GEORGE MANUEL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of GEORGE MANUEL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (GEORGE MANUEL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 18, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1381 Lower Tribunal No. F91-36905A ________________
George Manuel, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.
Robyn M. Blake, P.A., and Robyn Blake, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Beiro v. State, 289 So. 3d 511, 511-12 (Fla. 3d DCA
2019) (observing: “The mere incantation of the words ‘manifest injustice’
does not make it so. Beiro has failed to allege any facts—nor can he—to
justify invoking the extremely limited concept of manifest injustice to excuse
a procedural bar and allow us to review the merits of his instant claim . . . .
There is little doubt that every defendant believes they will suffer a ‘manifest
injustice’ if their postconviction claim is deemed foreclosed by the passage
of time. However, a defendant does not have an unlimited right to continue
to litigate (and relitigate) the validity of their conviction, and such a limited
right must be balanced against the State's competing and substantial interest
in the finality of judgments in criminal cases.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GEORGE MANUEL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-manuel-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.