George Mandel & Associates, Ltd. v. HLV Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

George Mandel & Associates, Ltd. v. HLV Realty Corp.

201 A.D.2d 618, 609 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 618 (George Mandel & Associates, Ltd. v. HLV Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George Mandel & Associates, Ltd. v. HLV Realty Corp., 201 A.D.2d 618, 609 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover a brokerage commission on the sale of real property, the defendants Henry Lewandowski and Richard Lipsman appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated August 7, 1990, as, upon granting reargument, denied the branch of their motion which was to dismiss the first and second causes of action asserted in the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the complaint adequately states causes of action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud. Balletta, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In consolidated actions, inter alia, to recover a brokerage commission on the sale of real property, the defendants Henry Lewandowski and Richard Lipsman appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cannavo, J.), dated August 7, 1990, as, upon granting reargument, denied the branch of their motion which was to dismiss the first and second causes of action asserted in the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the complaint adequately states causes of action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud. Balletta, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 618, 609 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-mandel-associates-ltd-v-hlv-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1994.