George M. v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

George M. v. Commissioner of Correction

928 A.2d 537, 283 Conn. 910, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 326

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 17, 2007

DocketSC 17941

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 928 A.2d 537 (George M. v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George M. v. Commissioner of Correction, 928 A.2d 537, 283 Conn. 910, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 326 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 101 Conn. App. 52 (AC 26961), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“(1) Whether the Appellate Court improperly-reversed the trial court’s decision which held that a sentenced prisoner whose dates of offense were identified as 1993-1995’ was not entitled to have statutory good time credits applied to his sentence as such credit is not available for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1994?

“(2) Whether the Appellate Court incorrectly held that good time statutes are penal in nature and, as such, the rule of lenity applies to their interpretation?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 101 Conn. App. 52 (AC 26961), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“(1) Whether the Appellate Court improperly-reversed the trial court’s decision which held that a sentenced prisoner whose dates of offense were identified as 1993-1995’ was not entitled to have statutory good time credits applied to his sentence as such credit is not available for offenses committed on or after October 1, 1994?

“(2) Whether the Appellate Court incorrectly held that good time statutes are penal in nature and, as such, the rule of lenity applies to their interpretation?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

928 A.2d 537, 283 Conn. 910, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-m-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack