George M. E. v. New York State Family Court

New York Court of Appeals

George M. E. v. New York State Family Court

653 N.E.2d 617, 85 N.Y.2d 964, 629 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1470

DecidedMay 11, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 653 N.E.2d 617 (George M. E. v. New York State Family Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George M. E. v. New York State Family Court, 653 N.E.2d 617, 85 N.Y.2d 964, 629 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1470 (N.Y. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from a Family Court order dated December 15, 1994, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie; appeal, insofar as taken from the March 28, 1995 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of [965]*965the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from a Family Court order dated December 15, 1994, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 28, 1995 order of the Appellate Division, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic. Motion for other relief denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from a Family Court order dated December 15, 1994, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie; appeal, insofar as taken from the March 28, 1995 Appellate Division order, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of [965]*965the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from a Family Court order dated December 15, 1994, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 28, 1995 order of the Appellate Division, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic. Motion for other relief denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

653 N.E.2d 617, 85 N.Y.2d 964, 629 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-m-e-v-new-york-state-family-court-ny-1995.