George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 2019·No. 01-18-01115-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: George M. Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Appellate case number: 01-18-01115-CV

Trial court case number: 36282

Trial court: 21st District Court of Washington County

Appellant, George M. Bishop. III, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s “Modified Judgment of Partially Probated Suspension.” And, appellant has filed a motion to stay “the remaining three (3) months of active suspension” pending resolution of the appeal. We deny the motion to stay. See Tex. R. Disciplinary P. 3.13 (providing judgment of suspension may be stayed during pendency of appeal if district court finds, upon competent evidence, that appellant’s “continued practice of law does not pose a continuing threat to the welfare of [appellant’s] clients or to the public”).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __February 12, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (George M, Bishop, III v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.