George L. Warn v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc., a Corporation
This text of 374 F.2d 893 (George L. Warn v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc., a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
374 F.2d 893
George L. WARN, Appellant,
v.
BROOKS-SCANLON, INC., a corporation, Appellee.
No. 21262.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 26, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; John F. Kilkenny, Judge.
Marvin S. Nepom, Ben T. Gray, Portland, Or., for appellant.
James V. Hurley, DeArmond, Goodrich, Gray, Fancher & Holmes, Bend, Or., for appellee.
ORDER AFFIRMING
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment dismissing the action is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, Warn v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc., D.C.Or., 256 F.Supp. 690.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 F.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-l-warn-v-brooks-scanlon-inc-a-corporation-ca9-1967.