George K. Scott & Co. v. Wiegand

Supreme Court of Kansas

George K. Scott & Co. v. Wiegand

81 P. 1132, 71 Kan. 886, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 296

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 7, 1905

DocketNo. 14,261

StatusPublished

This text of 81 P. 1132 (George K. Scott & Co. v. Wiegand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George K. Scott & Co. v. Wiegand, 81 P. 1132, 71 Kan. 886, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 296 (kan 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

A firm of real-estate agents brought an action to recover a commission on the sale of a farm. The case was tried and a verdict was rendered against the plaintiffs. They now prosecute error, but the only argument made for a reversal is based upon the claim that there was no evidence to support the verdict, and that a peremptory instruction should have been given to find for the plaintiffs. The evidence was conflicting. It would serve no useful purpose to review it in detail. It is sufficient to say that the admitted facts did not compel a finding for the plaintiffs.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

A firm of real-estate agents brought an action to recover a commission on the sale of a farm. The case was tried and a verdict was rendered against the plaintiffs. They now prosecute error, but the only argument made for a reversal is based upon the claim that there was no evidence to support the verdict, and that a peremptory instruction should have been given to find for the plaintiffs. The evidence was conflicting. It would serve no useful purpose to review it in detail. It is sufficient to say that the admitted facts did not compel a finding for the plaintiffs.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 P. 1132, 71 Kan. 886, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-k-scott-co-v-wiegand-kan-1905.