George J. Cooke Co. v. E. R. Stege Brewery

204 Ill. App. 372, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 402
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided March 20, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,120·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Interpleader—when question whether mortgagee is necessary party is not presented for review. Where a bill of interpleader to determine the right to certain rent deposited in court alleged that the complainant leased the premises from and attorned to one df the defendants, the other of whom was a mortgagee, and there was no averment to the contrary in the pleadings or the proof, held that the question whether the mortgagee was a necessary party to the suit was not presented for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George J. Cooke Co. v. E. R. Stege Brewery, 204 Ill. App. 372, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 402 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

204 Ill. App. 372 (George J. Cooke Co. v. E. R. Stege Brewery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.