George I. Green v. Lieutenant McDonald Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden Ms. Schneck, Counselor Sergeant Beard Doctor Snyder, Psychologist

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15899, 1994 WL 118443
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1994
Docket94-6119
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (George I. Green v. Lieutenant McDonald Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden Ms. Schneck, Counselor Sergeant Beard Doctor Snyder, Psychologist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George I. Green v. Lieutenant McDonald Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden Ms. Schneck, Counselor Sergeant Beard Doctor Snyder, Psychologist, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15899, 1994 WL 118443 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

George I. GREEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Lieutenant McDONALD; Joseph P. Sacchet, Warden; Ms.
Schneck, Counselor; Sergeant Beard; Doctor
Snyder, Psychologist, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6119.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-3940).

George I. Green, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Green v. McDonald, No. CA-93-3940 (D. Md. Jan. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15899, 1994 WL 118443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-i-green-v-lieutenant-mcdonald-joseph-p-sacc-ca4-1994.