George Hargrove, Jr. v. R. M. Muncy, Superintendent of Buckingham Correctional Center

823 F.2d 547, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8922, 1987 WL 37994
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 1987
Docket87-7547
StatusUnpublished

This text of 823 F.2d 547 (George Hargrove, Jr. v. R. M. Muncy, Superintendent of Buckingham Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Hargrove, Jr. v. R. M. Muncy, Superintendent of Buckingham Correctional Center, 823 F.2d 547, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8922, 1987 WL 37994 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

823 F.2d 547
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George HARGROVE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R. M. MUNCY, Superintendent of Buckingham Correctional
Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-7547

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 27, 1987.
Decided July 10, 1987.

George Hargrove, Jr., appellant pro se.

Donald Charles Gehring, Office of the Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

George Hargrove, Jr., a Virginia inmate, appeals the order of the district court dismissing his claim under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 for failure to pay a partial filing fee.

The district court determined that, during the six months prior to the filing of his claim, Hargrove received income in the sum of $379.96. Accordingly, the district court directed Hargrove to submit a reduced filing fee of $56.99 or to show special circumstances which would justify a different payment. After reviewing Hargrove's objections to the payment of the partial fee, the district court again ordered Hargrove to submit the partial filing fee. Upon Hargrove's failure to pay the $56.99, the district court dismissed the case.

As the assessment procedure followed by the district court comported with the system approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We note that, because the dismissal below was without prejudice, Hargrove may refile his complaint upon payment of any new fee imposed. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 F.2d 547, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8922, 1987 WL 37994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-hargrove-jr-v-r-m-muncy-superintendent-of-b-ca4-1987.