George Hann v. J. J. Naylor
This text of 355 F.2d 200 (George Hann v. J. J. Naylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
355 F.2d 200
George HANN et al., Appellants,
v.
J. J. NAYLOR, Appellee.
No. 20261.
No. 20262.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
January 5, 1966.
Ronald Lansing, of Bailey, Swink, Haas, Seagraves & Lansing, Portland, Or., King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Henry Camarot, of Sanders, Lively & Camarot Springfield, Or., for appellee.
Before BARNES, KOELSCH and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On consideration of the appeal, we find a strictly factual issue was determined in the District Court adverse to appellants. Under well-known rules governing our examination of evidence on an appeal, the evidence supports the trial court's determination, and we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 F.2d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-hann-v-j-j-naylor-ca9-1966.