George H. Marshall v. Sarah E. Warlick

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 22, 2013
DocketA13I0160
StatusPublished

This text of George H. Marshall v. Sarah E. Warlick (George H. Marshall v. Sarah E. Warlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George H. Marshall v. Sarah E. Warlick, (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ March 22, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13I0160. GEORGE H. MARSHALL v. SARAH E. WARLICK.

Sarah E. Warlick brought a divorce action against George H. Marshall, and Marshall filed his answer and defenses to her complaint. Soon thereafter, the trial court held a hearing to address solely the issue of whether the parties had a valid common-law marriage. The trial court entered its order recognizing the parties’ common-law marriage and issued a certificate of immediate review. Marshall filed this application for interlocutory appeal in this Court. Although the sparse record in this case impedes our jurisdictional evaluation, it appears that Marshall may have been seeking a dismissal of the divorce action. “In determining the proper procedure to follow in pursuing an appeal, the underlying subject matter generally controls over the relief sought.” Self v. Bayneum, 265 Ga. 14 (453 SE2d 27) (1995). Since the underlying subject matter is divorce, the Supreme Court of Georgia has appellate jurisdiction over this appeal. Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (6). See Blanton v. Blanton, 259 Ga. 622 (385 SE2d 672) (1989) (court reversed interlocutory order in pending divorce action, which claimed common-law marriage and sought custody of a child). Moreover, it is well- settled that the ultimate responsibility for determining appellate jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Georgia. See Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis &c., 267 Ga. 177, 178 (476 SE2d 587) (1996). Accordingly, it is ordered that this appeal be TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Georgia for appropriate appellate disposition. Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VIII.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 03/22/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Medical Clinic, Inc.
476 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Blanton v. Blanton
385 S.E.2d 672 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1989)
Self v. Bayneum
453 S.E.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
George H. Marshall v. Sarah E. Warlick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-h-marshall-v-sarah-e-warlick-gactapp-2013.