George Gelman v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. George Shulof, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1447 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Paul E. Slater, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1446 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Appeal of George Gelman and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445

Third Circuit

George Gelman v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. George Shulof, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1447 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Paul E. Slater, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1446 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Appeal of George Gelman and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445

612 F.2d 799

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 28, 1980

Docket78-1445

StatusPublished

This text of 612 F.2d 799 (George Gelman v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. George Shulof, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1447 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Paul E. Slater, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1446 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Appeal of George Gelman and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George Gelman v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. George Shulof, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1447 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Paul E. Slater, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, in No. 78-1446 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Appeal of George Gelman and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445, 612 F.2d 799 (3d Cir. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

612 F.2d 799

George GELMAN
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
George SHULOF, suing on behalf of himself and all other
persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1447,
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
Paul E. SLATER, on behalf of himself and all other persons
similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1446,
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
Appeal of George GELMAN and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445.

Nos. 78-1445 to 78-1447.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 14, 1978.
Reargued en banc Nov. 8, 1979.
Decided Jan. 28, 1980.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Hubert I. Teitelbaum, Judge.

Harold R. Schmidt, Rose, Schmidt, Dixon, Hasley, Whyte, Hardesty, Pittsburgh, Pa. and Howard A. Specter, Litman, Litman, Harris & Specter, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

Peter J. Nickles, Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ALDISERT, ADAMS, GIBBONS, HUNTER, GARTH, HIGGINBOTHAM and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court is evenly divided on this appeal.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Each party shall bear its own cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

612 F.2d 799

George GELMAN
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
George SHULOF, suing on behalf of himself and all other
persons similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1447,
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
Paul E. SLATER, on behalf of himself and all other persons
similarly situated, Appellant in No. 78-1446,
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION.
Appeal of George GELMAN and Fannie Mann in No. 78-1445.

Nos. 78-1445 to 78-1447.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Nov. 14, 1978.
Reargued en banc Nov. 8, 1979.
Decided Jan. 28, 1980.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Hubert I. Teitelbaum, Judge.

Harold R. Schmidt, Rose, Schmidt, Dixon, Hasley, Whyte, Hardesty, Pittsburgh, Pa. and Howard A. Specter, Litman, Litman, Harris & Specter, P. A., Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

Peter J. Nickles, Covington & Burling, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and ALDISERT, ADAMS, GIBBONS, HUNTER, GARTH, HIGGINBOTHAM and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court is evenly divided on this appeal.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Each party shall bear its own cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

612 F.2d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-gelman-v-westinghouse-electric-corporation-george-shulof-suing-on-ca3-1980.