George G. Blessitt and Willie Neal, Jr. v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co.

Eleventh Circuit

George G. Blessitt and Willie Neal, Jr. v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co.

836 F.2d 1571, 1988 WL 4244

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 20, 1988

Docket86-8123

StatusPublished

This text of 836 F.2d 1571 (George G. Blessitt and Willie Neal, Jr. v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George G. Blessitt and Willie Neal, Jr. v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Dixie Engine Co., 836 F.2d 1571, 1988 WL 4244 (11th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

836 F.2d 1571, 1988 WL 4244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-g-blessitt-and-willie-neal-jr-v-retirement-plan-for-employees-of-ca11-1988.