George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein

114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4905

This text of 114 F. 1021 (George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein, 114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4905 (circtsdny 1902).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The defendants have satisfactorily explained the presence of the patent mark on the metal work of some of their goods. Having brought all of these into court, the bits of metal may be removed from the supporters and kept in the clerk’s office, to be disposed of at final hearing. Following Judge Coxe’s decision (112 Fed. 1009), preliminary injunction may issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George Frost Co. v. Cohn
112 F. 1009 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-frost-co-v-frankenstein-circtsdny-1902.