George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein

114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4905
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided February 17, 1902·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The defendants have satisfactorily explained the presence of the patent mark on the metal work of some of their goods. Having brought all of these into court, the bits of metal may be removed from the supporters and kept in the clerk’s office, to be disposed of at final hearing. Following Judge Coxe’s decision (112 Fed. 1009), preliminary injunction may issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein, 114 F. 1021, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4905 (circtsdny 1902).

114 F. 1021 (George Frost Co. v. Frankenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George Frost Co. v. Cohn
112 F. 1009 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1901)