George French, Jr., and Mary E. French v. Harold A. Berliner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue

218 F.2d 351
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 1955
Docket13729_1
StatusPublished

This text of 218 F.2d 351 (George French, Jr., and Mary E. French v. Harold A. Berliner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George French, Jr., and Mary E. French v. Harold A. Berliner, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, 218 F.2d 351 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

218 F.2d 351

55-1 USTC P 9178

George FRENCH, Jr., and Mary E. French, Appellants,
v.
Harold A. BERLINER, former Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellee.

No. 13729.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 14, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division; Dal M. Lemmon, Judge.

Clyde C. Sherwood, John V. Lewis, M. L. Lieberman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Fred H. Youngman, Ellis N. Slack, Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Lloyd H. Burke, U.S. Atty., Charles Elmer Collett, San Francisco, Cal., William H. Lally, Asst. U.S. Attys., Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before MATHEWS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and DRIVER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, French v. Smyth, D.C.N.D.Cal., 110 F.Supp. 795, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

French v. Smyth
110 F. Supp. 795 (N.D. California, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 F.2d 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-french-jr-and-mary-e-french-v-harold-a-berl-ca9-1955.