George F. Shafer, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden

266 U.S. 593, 45 S. Ct. 197, 69 L. Ed. 458, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 316
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 5, 1925·No. 34·Published

Opinion

This cause is restored to the docket for reargument on all the questions involved, particularly including the following:

1. Whether the North Dakota statute of 1922 differs materially in its provisions and operation from the statute of 1919 which was held invalid by this Court in Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co., 258 U. S. 50, and Lemke v. Homer Farmers Elevator Co., 258 U. S. 65.

2. Whether and to what extent § 17 of the statute of 1922 gives effect to and continues in force the provisions of the statute of 1919.

3. Whether and in what particulars the statute of 1922 encroaches upon the field of regulation occupied by the United States Grain Standards Act or conflicts with that act or with its administration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George F. Shafer, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden, 266 U.S. 593, 45 S. Ct. 197, 69 L. Ed. 458, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 316 (1925).

266 U.S. 593 (George F. Shafer, as Attorney General of the State of North Dakota v. Farmers' Grain Company of Embden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of Embden
258 U.S. 50 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Lemke v. Homer Farmers Elevator Co.
258 U.S. 65 (Supreme Court, 1922)