George F. Jones & Co. v. Brown
31 A. 647, 167 Pa. 395, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 918
Opinion
We find nothing in this record that would justify a reversal of the order dissolving the attachment. Neither of the assignments of error requires special notice. They are all dismissed.
Judgment affirmed without prejudice, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George F. Jones & Co. v. Brown, 31 A. 647, 167 Pa. 395, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 918 (Pa. 1895).
31 A. 647 (George F. Jones & Co. v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Getz v. Harley
70 Pa. D. & C. 551 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1949)
C. G. Aschmann & Co. ex rel. Caesar & Co. v. Banks Bros.
8 Pa. D. & C. 677 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1926)