George F. Eubanks Mantel Co. v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

George F. Eubanks Mantel Co. v. Atkinson

96 S.E. 342, 22 Ga. App. 497, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 573

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 11, 1918

Docket9785

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 342 (George F. Eubanks Mantel Co. v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George F. Eubanks Mantel Co. v. Atkinson, 96 S.E. 342, 22 Ga. App. 497, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Etnas, J.

1. It is mow a settled rule that this court will not reverse judgments of lower courts on questions of fact, where there is any evidence to sustain the verdict or judgment complained of.

2. There was evidence to support the judgment rendered in the municipal court.

3. An exception based upon the admission of certain testimony too indefinite to have been harmful to the plaintiff is without merit, whether the testimony was admissible .or not.

4. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI