George Earl Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc.
This text of 200 F.2d 198 (George Earl Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
200 F.2d 198
George Earl TOOLSON, Appellant,
v.
NEW YORK YANKEES, Inc. et al., Appellees.
No. 13228.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 12, 1952.
Harry W. T. Ross, Gene M. Harris and Howard C. Parke, Santa Barbara, Cal., for appellant.
Norman S. Sterry, Henry F. Prince, Frederic H. Sturdy and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Victor Ford Collins, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Hollywood Baseball Ass'n.
Before MATHEWS, HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Toolson v. New York Yankees, D.C.S.D. Cal., 101 F.Supp. 93, the order of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 F.2d 198, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 4280, 1952 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-earl-toolson-v-new-york-yankees-inc-ca9-1952.