George Earl Danner v. Kathryn M. Danner

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 9, 2019·No. 09-18-00385-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-18-00385-CV

GEORGE EARL DANNER, Appellant V.

KATHRYN M. DANNER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 418th District Court Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17-03-04143-CV

ORDER

On March 27, 2019, we ordered the appellant, George Earl Danner, to post additional security of $403,000 to supersede the trial court’s judgment and suspended the parties’ rights to enforce the trial court’s judgment for twenty days from that date. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(e). On April 8, 2019, the appellant filed a motion for an extension of time of ten days to obtain and post the additional security. We grant the motion. We suspend the parties’ rights to enforce the trial court’s

judgment for an additional ten days, through April 26, 2019, so that the appellant has time to post the additional security needed to supersede the trial court’s judgment.

ORDER ENTERED April 9, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Earl Danner v. Kathryn M. Danner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

George Earl Danner v. Kathryn M. Danner (George Earl Danner v. Kathryn M. Danner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.