George E. McFarland v. United States

408 F.2d 376, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 1969
Docket26991_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 408 F.2d 376 (George E. McFarland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George E. McFarland v. United States, 408 F.2d 376, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13232 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is appropriate for summary disposition pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 20. The district court denied appellant’s petition for the writ of habeas corpus on the merits of the petition. We affirm.

Appellant is attacking his confinement in a federal penitentiary, challenging (1) the right of the government to aggregate his sentences to compute his good time allowance; (2) the jurisdiction by which the government arrested him on a parole violator’s warrant upon release from confinement in a state penitentiary; and (3) the established expiration date of his sentences.

Having considered all of appellant’s contentions, we find them to be without merit and contrary to the clear language of the statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 4161, 4164, 4203 and 4205) and established case law. Buchanan v. Blackwell, 5 Cir. 1967, 372 F.2d 451 ; Smith v. Blackwell, 5 Cir. 1966, 367 F.2d 539 ; Brown v. Kearney, 5 Cir. 1962, 302 F.2d 22.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schoffner v. United States Board of Parole
416 F. Supp. 759 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
408 F.2d 376, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 13232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-e-mcfarland-v-united-states-ca5-1969.