George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank
This text of George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 19, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00840-CV ——————————— GEORGE E. DIXON, Appellant V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 122nd Judicial District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-CV-0690
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, George E. Dixon, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required
filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees
Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before
the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex.
Aug. 16, 2013). Furthermore, appellant has failed to timely file his appellate brief.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1). After being notified by the Clerk of this
Court on November 5, 2014, that his appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to
pay the filing fee, and again on January 21, 2015, that his appeal was subject to
dismissal for failure to timely file his appellate brief, appellant failed to timely
respond to either notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of the required fee and
for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-e-dixon-v-federal-deposit-insurance-corpora-texapp-2015.