George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 23, 2015
Docket01-14-00840-CV
StatusPublished

This text of George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Opinion issued February 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00840-CV ——————————— GEORGE E. DIXON, Appellant V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 122nd Judicial District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11-CV-0690

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, George E. Dixon, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required

filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041(1) (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees

Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before

the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex.

Aug. 16, 2013). Furthermore, appellant has failed to timely file his appellate brief.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1). After being notified by the Clerk of this

Court on November 5, 2014, that his appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to

pay the filing fee, and again on January 21, 2015, that his appeal was subject to

dismissal for failure to timely file his appellate brief, appellant failed to timely

respond to either notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of the required fee and

for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
George E. Dixon v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-e-dixon-v-federal-deposit-insurance-corpora-texapp-2015.