George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States

316 F.2d 657
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 1963
Docket17446_1
StatusPublished

This text of 316 F.2d 657 (George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George E. Burroughs v. United States of America, James R. Burroughs v. United States of America, Ellsworth Brooks v. United States, 316 F.2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1963).

Opinion

316 F.2d 657

George E. BURROUGHS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
James R. BURROUGHS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Ellsworth BROOKS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 17234.

No. 17306.

No. 17446.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 26, 1963.

Decided March 7, 1963.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, John J. Sirica, District Judge.

Mr. William B. Bryant, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. William C. Gardner and Theodore R. Newman, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Robert A. Levetown, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Miss Barbara A. Lindemann, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Messrs. Nathan J. Paulson and Luke C. Moore, Asst. U. S. Attys. at the time the record was filed, also entered appearances for appellee in No. 17234.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are from convictions of robbery. D.C.Code § 22-2901. Testimony identifying the appellants as the robbers was properly submitted to the jury. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22-2901
District of Columbia § 22-2901

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 F.2d 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-e-burroughs-v-united-states-of-america-james-r-burroughs-v-cadc-1963.