George D. MacE Jr. v. United States

42 F.3d 1400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39481, 1994 WL 659228
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 1994
Docket93-17007
StatusUnpublished

This text of 42 F.3d 1400 (George D. MacE Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George D. MacE Jr. v. United States, 42 F.3d 1400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39481, 1994 WL 659228 (9th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

42 F.3d 1400

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
George D. MACE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-17007.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 2, 1994.*
Decided Nov. 22, 1994.

Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

George D. Mace brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1346(b), 2671-80. In it he asserts that the Federal Aviation Administration tortiously revoked his aircraft mechanic's certificate. At root the basis of his action is that the FAA has no authority to revoke certificates. The district court dismissed the action on grounds that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

In this case, the determinations which indicate a failure to state a claim also indicate that the district court was without jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See Roundtree v. United States, No. 93-35792, slip op. ---- at ---- (9th Cir. ______, 1994), which was filed on the same day as the filing of this memorandum disposition. Therefore, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

**

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F.3d 1400, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39481, 1994 WL 659228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-d-mace-jr-v-united-states-ca9-1994.