George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist.
199 N.E. 217, 130 Ohio St. 337, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337, 4 Ohio Op. 360, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 208
This text of 199 N.E. 217 (George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist., 199 N.E. 217, 130 Ohio St. 337, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337, 4 Ohio Op. 360, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 208 (Ohio 1935).
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Langenau Mfg. Co. v. City of Cleveland
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 525 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
199 N.E. 217, 130 Ohio St. 337, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337, 4 Ohio Op. 360, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-d-harter-bank-of-canton-v-muskingum-watershed-conservancy-dist-ohio-1935.