George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist.
199 N.E. 217, 130 Ohio St. 337, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337, 4 Ohio Op. 360, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 208
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist., 199 N.E. 217, 130 Ohio St. 337, 130 Ohio St. (N.S.) 337, 4 Ohio Op. 360, 1935 Ohio LEXIS 208 (Ohio 1935).
199 N.E. 217 (George D. Harter Bank of Canton v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Langenau Mfg. Co. v. City of Cleveland
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 525 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)