George Coleman and Juanita Bruce, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Electric Company Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and General Electric Ceramics, Inc.

822 F.2d 59, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8722
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 1987
Docket86-5747
StatusUnpublished

This text of 822 F.2d 59 (George Coleman and Juanita Bruce, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Electric Company Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and General Electric Ceramics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Coleman and Juanita Bruce, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. General Electric Company Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and General Electric Ceramics, Inc., 822 F.2d 59, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8722 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

822 F.2d 59

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
George COLEMAN and Juanita Bruce, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company; and General Electric Ceramics, Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 86-5747, 86-5789 and 86-5981

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 7, 1987.

Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants, George Coleman and Juanita Bruce, appeal the grant of summary judgment for defendants-appellees, General Electric Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and General Electric Ceramics, Inc. Upon examination of the briefs and record in this case and upon consideration of the oral arguments presented by the parties, we AFFIRM based upon the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of Judge R. Allan Edgar. See Coleman v. General Electric Company, 643 F.Supp. 1229 (E.D. Tenn. 1986). Furthermore, after examination of the record and briefs, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court orders denying class certification and awarding costs to appellees.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coleman v. General Electric Co.
643 F. Supp. 1229 (E.D. Tennessee, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 F.2d 59, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 8722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-coleman-and-juanita-bruce-on-behalf-of-themselves-and-all-others-ca6-1987.