George Carlisle, Jr. v. Missouri Department of Mental
This text of 270 F. App'x 466 (George Carlisle, Jr. v. Missouri Department of Mental) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George Carlisle appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII action alleging that the Missouri Department of Mental Health discriminated against him on the basis of his race when it failed to hire him. Upon de novo review, see Turner v. Honeywell Fed. Mfg. & Techs., L.L.C., 336 F.3d 716, 719-20 (8th Cir.2003), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 F. App'x 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-carlisle-jr-v-missouri-department-of-mental-ca8-2008.