George Carlisle, Jr. v. City of St. Peters

Eighth Circuit

George Carlisle, Jr. v. City of St. Peters

306 F. App'x 326

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2009·No. 07-2849·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George W. Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George W. Carlisle, Jr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Upon careful de novo review, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

George Carlisle, Jr. v. City of St. Peters, 306 F. App'x 326 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

306 F. App'x 326 (George Carlisle, Jr. v. City of St. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related