George C. Magee v. General Motors Corporation

220 F.2d 270
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 14, 1955·No. 11478·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was here before on the defendant’s appeal from the refusal of its motion for a new trial.. 3 Cir., 213 F.2d 899. We remanded it to the district, court to reconsider the motion in the light of its view of the weight of the *271 evidence and all other relevant factors. The district court did so and again denied the motion for a new trial. 124 F.Supp. 606. On this appeal from that decision the defendant, conceding that there was evidence to support the verdict, still urges that it was nonetheless against the weight of the evidence. But this argument, which was available to him in the district court, is not open to him here since we may not reverse upon that ground a judgment of a district court entered upon a verdict. Miller v. United States, 3 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 592, 594.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George C. Magee v. General Motors Corporation, 220 F.2d 270 (3d Cir. 1955).

220 F.2d 270 (George C. Magee v. General Motors Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlas Aluminum Corp. v. Borden Chemical Corp.
233 F. Supp. 53 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)
Thompson v. Reedman
199 F. Supp. 120 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1961)
No. 12099
250 F.2d 285 (Third Circuit, 1957)
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit
250 F.2d 285 (Third Circuit, 1957)
Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.
250 F.2d 285 (Third Circuit, 1957)
Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company
134 F. Supp. 829 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1955)