George C. Dreos v. Joseph Sitnick and Michael Agriesti

309 F.2d 232
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 1962
Docket16973_1
StatusPublished

This text of 309 F.2d 232 (George C. Dreos v. Joseph Sitnick and Michael Agriesti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George C. Dreos v. Joseph Sitnick and Michael Agriesti, 309 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Opinion

*233 PER CURIAM.

This is a paid appeal from a judgment of the District Court dismissing appellant’s complaint in a libel suit.

On the record before us, the appeal should be dismissed as frivolous, and an order to that end will be entered.

Appeal dismissed as frivolous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 F.2d 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-c-dreos-v-joseph-sitnick-and-michael-agriesti-cadc-1962.