George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras
205 F.2d 957, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1953
Docket13424
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 205 F.2d 957 (George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras, 205 F.2d 957, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696 (9th Cir. 1953).
Opinion
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Dix v. Bank of California National Assn., D.C.N.D.Cal., 113 F.Supp. 823, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Heyn
139 F. Supp. 602 (S.D. California, 1956)
Callwood v. The Virgin Islands National Bank
221 F.2d 770 (Third Circuit, 1955)
Callwood v. Virgin Islands National Bank
221 F.2d 770 (Third Circuit, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
205 F.2d 957, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-c-dix-v-ismael-nleto-pineda-as-fiscal-interventor-of-the-republic-ca9-1953.