George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras
205 F.2d 957, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696
Opinion
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, Dix v. Bank of California National Assn., D.C.N.D.Cal., 113 F.Supp. 823, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras, 205 F.2d 957, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696 (9th Cir. 1953).
205 F.2d 957 (George C. Dix v. Ismael Nleto Pineda, as Fiscal Interventor of the Republic of Honduras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Heyn
139 F. Supp. 602 (S.D. California, 1956)
Callwood v. The Virgin Islands National Bank
221 F.2d 770 (Third Circuit, 1955)
Callwood v. Virgin Islands National Bank
221 F.2d 770 (Third Circuit, 1955)