George Bernard Byrden v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

George Bernard Byrden v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 26, 2016

Docket15-5898

StatusPublished

This text of George Bernard Byrden v. State of Florida (George Bernard Byrden v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George Bernard Byrden v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GEORGE BERNARD BYRDEN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-5898

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed April 25, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

George Bernard Byrden, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the “petition to be heard on redress: manifest constitutional error” as a

petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878

So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI