George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided January 14, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-10725·Unknown

Opinion

1 Eejraickk Lso. nJa@ckcsoozne,n E.csoqm. (SBN 166010) 2 COZEN O'CONNOR 601 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 3700 3 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: 213.892.7900 4 Facsimile: 213.892.7999 5 Attorneys for Defendants NOVA LIFESTYLE, INC., THANH H. LAM and 6 JEFFERY CHUANG 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE BARNEY, Individually and on ) Case No. 2:18-cv-10725-TJH (AFMx) 11 behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) STIPULATED [PROPOSED] 12 Plaintiff, ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) GOVERNING CONFIDENTIAL 13 vs. ) INFORMATION NOVA LIFESTYLE, INC., THANH H. ) 14 LAM, an individual, YA MING WONG, ) an individual, JEFFERY CHUANG, an ) 15 individual, and YUEN CHING HO, an ) individual, ) 16 ) Defendants. ) 17 ) 18 19 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 22 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary,or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 25 and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. 26 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the 27 following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does 28 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that 1 the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 2 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 3 legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, 4 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 5 information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must 6 be followed and the standards that will be applied when a partyseeks permission from 7 the court to file material under seal. 8 9 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 10 This action is likely to involve trade secrets and other valuable research, 11 development, commercial, financial, technical, and/or proprietary information for 12 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 13 than litigation of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials 14 and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial 15 information, information regarding confidential business practices, policies and/or 16 procedures, or other confidential research, development, or commercial information 17 (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information 18 otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise 19 protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, 20 or common law. Public disclosure of such information, documents, and materials 21 would result in prejudice or harm to the Parties by providing their respective 22 competitors with an unfair business advantage. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 23 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 24 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep 25 confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such 26 material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the 27 end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 28 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information 1 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 2 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 3 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 4 record of this case. 5 6 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDER SEAL FILING 7 PROCEDURE 8 The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.3, below, that this 9 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 10 under seal. Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 11 the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the Court to 12 file material under seal. There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of 13 access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non- 14 dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See 15 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); 16 Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (even 17 stipulated protective orders require good cause showing and a specific showing of 18 good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal 19 justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a Party seeks to file 20 under seal). The Parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as 21 CONFIDENTIAL does not – without the submission of competent evidence by 22 declaration establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 23 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable – constitute good cause. 24 Further, if a Party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then 25 compelling reasons, not only goodcause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief 26 sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See 27 Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item 28 or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal, 1 the Party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific 2 facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent 3 evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by 4 declaration. 5 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 6 its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If 7 documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only 8 the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall 9 be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety 10 should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 11 12 4. DEFINITIONS 13 4.1 Action: Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc., Case No. 2:18-cv-10725-TJH 14 (AFMx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. 15 4.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 16 of information or items under this Order. 17 4.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 18 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 19 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 20 Cause Statement. 21 4.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 22 support staff). 23 4.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 24 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 25 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 26 4.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 27 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 28 1 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 2 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2021).

George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc. (George Barney v. Nova Lifestyle, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)