George Alvin Cantrell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, the South Carolina Department of Corrections

16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7265, 1994 WL 38850
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1994
Docket93-7054
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 408 (George Alvin Cantrell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, the South Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Alvin Cantrell v. Parker Evatt, Commissioner, the South Carolina Department of Corrections, 16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7265, 1994 WL 38850 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 408
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

George Alvin CANTRELL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner, the South Carolina Department of
Corrections, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-3129)

George Alvin Cantrell, appellant pro se.

Stephen Dallas Baggett, Roy Robinson Hemphill, Burns, McDonald, Bradford, Patrick & Dean, Greenwood, SC, for appellee.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part the Appellee's motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 408, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7265, 1994 WL 38850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-alvin-cantrell-v-parker-evatt-commissioner--ca4-1994.