George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone
265 F.2d 638, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of burglary and appeals. The only contention deserving our consideration is that he was convicted on perjured testimony. Since he has not charged that any false testimony was known to be such by anyone in the case acting upon behalf of the Government of the Canal Zone, the contention cannot prevail. See Sears v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 301. The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone, 265 F.2d 638, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132 (5th Cir. 1959).
265 F.2d 638 (George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tiny Glen A. Sears v. United States
265 F.2d 301 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)