George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone

Fifth Circuit

George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone

265 F.2d 638, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 1, 1959

Docket17416_1

StatusPublished

This text of 265 F.2d 638 (George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George A. Polson v. Government of the Canal Zone, 265 F.2d 638, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132 (5th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of burglary and appeals. The only contention deserving our consideration is that he was convicted on perjured testimony. Since he has not charged that any false testimony was known to be such by anyone in the case acting upon behalf of the Government of the Canal Zone, the contention cannot prevail. See Sears v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 301. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of burglary and appeals. The only contention deserving our consideration is that he was convicted on perjured testimony. Since he has not charged that any false testimony was known to be such by anyone in the case acting upon behalf of the Government of the Canal Zone, the contention cannot prevail. See Sears v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 301. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 F.2d 638, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-a-polson-v-government-of-the-canal-zone-ca5-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack