George A. Otto v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, No. 71-1436 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Parti
This text of 444 F.2d 219 (George A. Otto v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, No. 71-1436 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Parti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
444 F.2d 219
78 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2998, 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,309
George A. OTTO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 71-1436 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, PartI.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 16, 1971.
Ben G. Levy, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.
Tommy B. Duke, A. J. Harper, II, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee; Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Jr., District Judge. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.2
The decision below is reported as Otto v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company, S.D.Tex.1970, 319 F.Supp. 262
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 F.2d 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-a-otto-v-houston-belt-terminal-railway-company-no-71-1436-ca5-1971.