Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Geoffroy v. Schmidt

Geoffroy v. Schmidt

279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 912 (Geoffroy v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geoffroy v. Schmidt, 279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

There was neither limitation of time nor expressed contingency which might terminate the agreement not to seek partition and it was, therefore, against public policy in that the power to alienate was suspended for an unreasonable time. (Haeussler v. Missouri Iron Co., 110 Mo. 188; Shelby v. Shelby, 192 Ky. 304; 68 C. J. S., Partition, § 44, pp. 67-68.) Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Carswell, Acting P. J., concurs in result. [See post, p. 1010.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leonardo v. Leonardo
297 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Levy v. Herson
127 Misc. 2d 634 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Tramontano v. Catalano
23 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Albin v. Albin
26 Misc. 2d 383 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 912, 110 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geoffroy-v-schmidt-nyappdiv-1952.