Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States

5 Cust. Ct. 476, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3187

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1940

DocketNo. 4961; Entry Nos. 1004

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 476 (Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cust. Ct. 476, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3187 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

KiNCHbloe, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision by the parties hereto on the following stipulation:

It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court that the value for regular duties under the Tariff Act of 1930 are the values as appraised, and that the dumping duties which were assessed in the above-entitled reappraisement cases under the Anti-Dumping Act are inapplicable and should be refunded.

On the agreed facts I find the values for regular duties under the Tariff Act of 1930 are the values as appraised, and that the dumping duties which were assessed under the antidumping act are inapplicable and should be refunded. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KiNCHbloe, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision by the parties hereto on the following stipulation:

It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court that the value for regular duties under the Tariff Act of 1930 are the values as appraised, and that the dumping duties which were assessed in the above-entitled reappraisement cases under the Anti-Dumping Act are inapplicable and should be refunded.

On the agreed facts I find the values for regular duties under the Tariff Act of 1930 are the values as appraised, and that the dumping duties which were assessed under the antidumping act are inapplicable and should be refunded. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Cust. Ct. 476, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geo-wm-rueff-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1940.