Home/Texas Supreme Court/Geo Viking, Inc. v. Tex-Lee Operating Co.

Geo Viking, Inc. v. Tex-Lee Operating Co.

839 S.W.2d 797, 1992 WL 311408
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 1992·No. D-1678·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*798 PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The motions for rehearing are overruled. The per curiam opinion and judgment of this court issued April 22, 1992 are withdrawn. Further, the order of this court of April 22, 1992, granting the application for writ of error is withdrawn, as the application was improvidently granted.

In denying petitioner’s application for writ of error, we should not be understood as approving or disapproving the opinions of the court of appeals analyzing the rule of capture or trespass as they apply to hydraulic fracturing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geo Viking, Inc. v. Tex-Lee Operating Co., 839 S.W.2d 797, 1992 WL 311408 (Tex. 1992).

839 S.W.2d 797 (Geo Viking, Inc. v. Tex-Lee Operating Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sciscoe v. Texas)
519 S.W.3d 171 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015)
William Sciscoe, Denise Sciscoe, Eric Dow, Angela Dow, Robert Draper, Michelle Draper, John Harris, Kimberly Harris, Charles Pegg, Geraldine Pegg, Cody Petree, Alice Randall, Johnny Reames, Jeannette Reames, Margaret Wagner, Jane Wagner, and Town of DISH v. Enbridge Gathering (North Texas) L.P., Atmos Energy Corporation, Energy Transfer Fuel, L.P., Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L.L.C., Texas Midstream Gas Services, L.L.C.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
FPL Farming Ltd. v. Environmental Processing Systems, L.C.
305 S.W.3d 739 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)