Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 869, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Cust. Ct. 344
United States Customs Court·Decided March 1, 1967·No. No. P67/55; protests 272443-K, etc. (Portland, Oreg.)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 869, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1953 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 869 (Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. Kay Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 130 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)