Geo. Ross Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Geo. Ross Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 367, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 264

United States Customs Court·Decided February 28, 1951·No. No. 55272; protests 142496-K, etc. (New York)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the items in question consist of decorated earthenware having a body including the engobe or body slip, not artificially colored, and composed wholly of clay. In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that the merchandise in question consists of earthenware articles composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body, not artificially colored and composed wholly of clay, which articles are painted, colored, tinted, stained, enameled, gilded, printed, ornamented, or decorated. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the items in question consist of decorated earthenware having a body including the engobe or body slip, not artificially colored, and composed wholly of clay. In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that the merchandise in question consists of earthenware articles composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body, not artificially colored and composed wholly of clay, which articles are painted, colored, tinted, stained, enameled, gilded, printed, ornamented, or decorated. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Geo. Ross Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 367, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 264 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

26 Cust. Ct. 367 (Geo. Ross Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related