Geo. Ross Co. v. United States

26 Cust. Ct. 367, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 264
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1951
DocketNo. 55272; protests 142496-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 Cust. Ct. 367 (Geo. Ross Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Geo. Ross Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 367, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 264 (cusc 1951).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the items in question consist of decorated earthenware having a body including the engobe or body slip, not artificially colored, and composed wholly of clay. In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that the merchandise in question consists of earthenware articles composed of a nonvitrified absorbent body, not artificially colored and composed wholly of clay, which articles are painted, colored, tinted, stained, enameled, gilded, printed, ornamented, or decorated. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peacock Sales Co. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 757 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Cust. Ct. 367, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/geo-ross-co-v-united-states-cusc-1951.