Geo. J. Haenn, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit

Geo. J. Haenn, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

147 F.2d 682

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 14, 1945·No. No. 8762·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only question involved in the case is whether certain expenditures should be allowed as deductions from income of taxpayer, on the ground that they constituted ordinary and necessary business expenses within the meaning of sec. 23(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 23(a). The question is one of fact (Com’r v. Heininger, 320 U.S. 467, 47S, 64 S.Ct. 249) ; and the finding of the Tax Court finds ample support in the evidence. The decision appealed from will accordingly be affirmed. Dobson v. Com’r, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only question involved in the case is whether certain expenditures should be allowed as deductions from income of taxpayer, on the ground that they constituted ordinary and necessary business expenses within the meaning of sec. 23(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 23(a). The question is one of fact (Com’r v. Heininger, 320 U.S. 467, 47S, 64 S.Ct. 249) ; and the finding of the Tax Court finds ample support in the evidence. The decision appealed from will accordingly be affirmed. Dobson v. Com’r, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239.

Affirmed.

Geo. J. Haenn, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 147 F.2d 682 (3d Cir. 1945).

Pincite

147 F.2d 682 (Geo. J. Haenn, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related